Officials hope changes remove stain of scandal
Source: |
Dallas Morning News |
Date: |
January 12, 2003 |
Author: |
Cathy Harasta |
By the next Winter Olympics, figure skating expects to have
regrouped so radically that scores will resemble those of veteran
league bowlers. Skating's new framework proposes to ditch those
strings of 5.8s in favor of a single, cumulative score, perhaps a 178.
And fans can forget blaming specific judges for outcomes. A
computer will randomly choose which nine scores count from the
14-member judging panel, keeping even the judges in the dark as to
whether they fired a blank.
A state of flux best describes international figure skating's
condition since the sport's image nosedived at February's Salt Lake
City Olympics. Beyond that, getting a handle on where skating stands
is a slippery endeavor during a reconstruction era for the Winter
Games' most visible sport.
Many members of skating's inner circle said they are suspending
judgment on the sport's prognosis, considering the renovations in
progress.
Scorched by scandal, skating strikes some as discredited beyond
repair. Others contend that boom and doom can coexist in a sport as
likely to be enlivened by controversies as busted for them. Exhibit A:
Tonya vs. Nancy in 1994.
U.S. officials cite skating's unflagging athlete and sponsor
support in the past year, despite the Olympic pairs judging scandal
that resulted in the awarding of two sets of gold medals.
But as familiar judging and scoring systems bow to innovations,
skating seeks a new center of balance. The new methodologies strive to
curtail cheating and prevent another Salt Lake pairs-type
debacle. Though well-intentioned, the proposed systems have revealed
rough edges and some wacky, imponderable aspects during recent tests.
Most skaters, coaches and officials predicted the changes will not
disfigure the sport, and skating will land on its feet. Others didn't
sound so sure.
"Let's not set off flares," four-time world champion Kurt Browning
of Canada said. "Don't call 9-1-1. The new system allows skaters to
make more choices - like a football team coming up with a game plan."
This season has featured an interim judging system and experiments
with a proposed scoring method that would abolish the traditional 6.0
scale. The new systems are about 18 months from review and will
require passage by the 2004 International Skating Union Congress.
"I don't think it will work," 1988 Olympic champion Brian Boitano
said. "It's too complicated, especially for the American public."
At the U.S. Championships in Dallas starting Sunday, traditional
judging and scoring will be used.
"This is a very confusing year for judging," said U.S. Figure
Skating Association president Phyllis Howard, a veteran national judge
and referee. "But the judging controversy shouldn't overshadow the
efforts of the athletes. They really are splendid athletes."
Howard, a Washington, D.C.-area business owner, said the sport's
growth remained consistent through 2002, with the USFSA's Learn to
Skate program topping 100,000 members for the first time - an
indication of grassroots support. She said the USFSA's key corporate
sponsors remained committed.
The Olympic scandal and subsequent reform plans led to lots of
conversation among recreational skaters but did not discourage their
interest, said Patti Feeney, managing director of the Dallas-based Ice
Skating Institute. The institute tracks the sport for rink owners and
focuses on stimulating growth in recreational skating.
Stars abound
The sport's pros and cons weave a chaotic tapestry. Skating is the
picture of robust health in magnetic stars, such as Olympic champion
Sarah Hughes, who seeks her first U.S. championship at the Dallas
Nationals. The fresh-faced Long Island teenager rallied on the
decisive night in Salt Lake City, helping counteract the pairs judging
calamity that had dominated the Games.
"It was all set up to explode," said Browning, who in 1988 became
the first skater to land a quadruple jump in competition. "If that had
happened anywhere else except on a U.S. stage, it wouldn't have had
the Jay Leno and David Letterman treatment. What frustrates me the
most is that a lot of the media think this sport can't be interesting
without the element of Jerry Springer."
But figure skating always has been well-stocked with human interest
and hardly imperiled by human fallibility.
Fueled by the Tonya Harding-Nancy Kerrigan knee-whacking fiasco,
figure skating telecasts from the 1994 Games set Olympic ratings
records, with the women's short program posting a 48.5 - sixth-highest
on TV's all-time ratings list.
Salt Lake City had put behind it an Olympic bid-rigging and bribery
scandal when along came "SkateGate."
Figure skating stole the Salt Lake show after revelations that a
prearranged French-Russian vote swap had fixed the top medals in pairs
and ice dancing.
Dallas native Paul Wylie, the 1992 Olympic silver medalist, said
figure skating suffers from a problem common to amateur sports
organizations.
"The major flaw is when the technical committee is a self-appointed
board," Wylie said. "There's a lot that they kind of decide in a
vacuum."
The ISU - figure skating's global governing body - recently created
a restructuring commission that will consider ethical concerns and
infractions.
Grumbling about corrupt judges and politically motivated
deal-making had been part of the sport's bedrock for decades. The ISU
had started to scrutinize judging problems more than a year before the
Salt Lake Olympics. At those Games, French pairs judge Marie-Reine Le
Gougne said she had been pressured by her federation to vote "a
certain way."
Her admission resulted in a second set of gold medals for Canadians
Jamie Sale and David Pelletier, who became co-champions with Russia's
Elena Berezhnaya and Anton Sikharulidze.
Le Gougne and French skating federation chief Didier Gailhaguet
received three-year suspensions from the ISU, which also banned the
two from the 2006 Winter Olympics in Turin, Italy. The saga spun
further toward epic lunacy last summer, when a reputed Russian
mobster, Alimzhan Tokhtakhounov, was arrested in Italy on U.S. charges
of conspiracy to help fix the Salt Lake pairs and ice dance
results. He is being held in a Venice prison, awaiting extradition to
the United States.
In June, the ISU Congress had approved judging and scoring reform
measures that are in the test stages at ISU Grand Prix events.
The temporary system uses a 10-judge panel, with seven marks
counting and no one knowing which judges' scores were used.
"The process will become fairer," said Fredi Schmid, the ISU
general secretary. "What happened at the Olympics certainly helped us
accelerate this."
End of the 6.0 scale?
Before the 2006 Olympics, ISU officials intend to have in place a
completely different scoring method from all previous Games. A points
system, with preassigned values for each element of a skater's
program, would replace the 6.0 scale in use for a century.
The point values for elements have not been finalized.
"I don't think it will change the outcome too much," said two-time
U.S. silver medalist Sasha Cohen. "As skaters, it doesn't really
change our part at all."
The new process would award points based on difficulty, with a
quadruple jump naturally worth more than a triple jump.
A skater's final mark, calculated electronically, also would
reflect technical proficiency and components of artistry. A sample
score might be in the 170s.
The new system would allow skaters to set world records as high
scorers. By putting a cap on jumps, the planners aim to prevent
competitions from becoming artless leaping contests.
Designed to eliminate cheating, the methodology incorporates
touch-screen computers and judges' anonymity. Nine of 14 judges'
scores would count, with just totals made public. In theory, the
system measures a skater, move by move, against a standard and not
against other skaters. That shift reduces the chance for a judge to
play favorites or to play politics.
"You add points instead of deducting points, which is a positive
system," said Benoit Lavoie, an official with Skate Canada - that
nation's governing body for figure skating. Lavoie was one of the
judges of the Salt Lake Olympic pairs competition.
During Skate Canada, an ISU Grand Prix event on Oct. 30-Nov. 3 in
Quebec City, the touch-screen part of the new scoring process was
tested. Here's how it worked:
- A chief observer, or "element specialist," acted as sort of an
expert witness, identifying a jump as it was performed.
- . That specialist then typed the jump name into a central
computer.
- . The jump title appeared on each judge's screen.
- . Each judge decided the jump's execution and quality based on a
scale of minus-3 to 3, with zero designating the jump performed as
average in quality.
- . To record a score, each judge touched one of seven boxes -
numbered from minus-3 through 3 - on the computer screen.
All of that is for one element of a program. Typed lists of a
skater's elements are available ahead of time, but if a skater
deviates from the program, the specialist will have to adjust in a
flash.
"If it takes 20 or 30 seconds and the heads are still down looking
at where to hit a computer button, they'd miss the skating," said John
Nicks, who coached Olympic skaters including Cohen, fourth at the 2002
Games.
Browning said the element specialists will have a huge
responsibility: "That's the one part I am concerned about," he said.
Skaters respond
As the proposed changes have gained exposure, skaters have tried to
imagine various applications of the new systems.
"You have to write down your jumps in the order you'll perform
them," said six-time U.S. champion Todd Eldredge, who retired from
Olympic-style skating in February. "In golf, that would be like
saying, 'Well, I plan on hitting this 400-yard drive.' Maybe you'd get
a minus-3 if you completely shanked it."
The USFSA's Howard, a member of the ISU Council, emphasized that
the systems being tested are not in final form.
"We need to be able to examine it thoroughly," she said. "We will
continue to have input."
To lessen the chances of judges' being pressured, ISU officials
made judges' anonymity a prominent facet of the innovations, along
with more precise scoring guidelines.
Reigning world and Olympic champion Alexei Yagudin of Russia gave
the interim judging system a thumbs down in October. He was quoted as
saying it was a "huge mistake." ISU officials, however, said they have
been pleased with the interim test stage, budgeted at $500,000.
"My concern is whether they have 14 judges who are really
proficient," Boitano said. "The Olympics was a huge eye-opener for the
public."
ISU consultant Ted Barton, who helped formulate the interim system
and is observing the tests, predicted coaches and skaters will have
more solid information to use in planning their programs.
"The well-balanced program of the future is different from what
skaters are skating now," said Barton, a former Canadian world team
member and international coach. "I think you'll see it become more
creative."
|